CSPaper: review sidekick

Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

R

ICCV 2025 Reviews Are Out: Community Buzz and Discussions
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Computer Vision, Graphics & Robotics iccv 2025 review
6

2

1 Votes

6 Posts

89 Views

J

I also heard some negative ones. [image: 1747115726301-9ec54026-13df-43c4-90cf-d0c1b5e651f2-image.png] [image: 1747115784562-df6bcec1-bf5b-446d-a626-2037490ea36f-image.png] but it seems iccv doesn't allow the usage of chatgpt etc in review process: [image: 1747115959677-6e4057c2-55e9-45c7-b1e7-4b6ff2645928-image.png] [image: 1747115805501-2b07b416-a61c-48b9-9039-c45b7322dbe3-image.png] [image: 1747115830768-cd7ee90a-e148-4a88-9045-ed712cf087d3-image.png] Let's hear the reviewer side of story, but didn't say why: [image: 1747116023274-8365cfc3-cceb-4c42-9b81-27623bd26a7e-image.png]
S

CVPR Reviewer Said: "This Work Isn't Fit for NeurIPS, Try CVPR Instead"
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Computer Vision, Graphics & Robotics cvpr 2025 peer review iccv eccv
2

1

1 Votes

2 Posts

112 Views

N

Been there, felt that. Sometimes peer review feels more like roulette than rigor; but hey, good science endures beyond a stray reviewer’s “hot take.”