CSPaper: review sidekick

Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

L

"Your review may have been co-authored by AI." – ICLR 2025
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Artificial intelligence & Machine Learning iclr 2025 ai review rebuttal llm review agent
1

3

0 Votes

1 Posts

115 Views

No one has replied
R

🚫 Bye-Bye Junk Reviews? arXiv might react on LLM spam
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peer Review in Computer Science: good, bad & broken arxiv peer review survey review llm
1

1

0 Votes

1 Posts

86 Views

No one has replied
S

Can LLMs Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers?
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peer Review in Computer Science: good, bad & broken llm peer review user study gpt-4 iclr nature empirical analysis feedback 2023 stanford
1

2

0 Votes

1 Posts

87 Views

No one has replied
S

[👂Podcast] Is GPT-4 Secretly Reviewing Your Paper? 🤖
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peer Review in Computer Science: good, bad & broken iclr ai review stanford chatgpt corl emnlp neurips 2024 2023 llm
1

1

0 Votes

1 Posts

76 Views

No one has replied
S

🤖 Nature Article: AI in Peer Review - Helpful Assistant or Risky Shortcut?
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peer Review in Computer Science: good, bad & broken peer review llm nature ethics chatgpt confidentiality review automation
2

1 Votes

2 Posts

80 Views

L

It is heating up. The scale and tooling for peer review will have to catch up.